Drabble: 'Rope's End'
Nov. 9th, 2008 04:10 pm100 words of unbetaed, end-of-CotBP drabble for the current prompt at
blackpearlsails...
~ Rope's End ~
Choking, wide-eyed, scrabbling for purchase, for balance, for breath, he's only half aware of the surrounding tumult, the seconds stretching slow and harsh as the rough hemp tearing at his neck.
Then a thunk! and he's falling, standing, on solid ground. The sword's stuck fast, thanks to Will's trick, but Jack frees his wrists, frees the only other weapon to hand, and runs.
Should be some needle-witted saying about nooses turning to lifelines, he muses, but his friend's there, catching the tossed end, and as they begin to bowl over lobsterbacks only one maxim occurs: Time is of the essence.
~.~
~ Rope's End ~
Choking, wide-eyed, scrabbling for purchase, for balance, for breath, he's only half aware of the surrounding tumult, the seconds stretching slow and harsh as the rough hemp tearing at his neck.
Then a thunk! and he's falling, standing, on solid ground. The sword's stuck fast, thanks to Will's trick, but Jack frees his wrists, frees the only other weapon to hand, and runs.
Should be some needle-witted saying about nooses turning to lifelines, he muses, but his friend's there, catching the tossed end, and as they begin to bowl over lobsterbacks only one maxim occurs: Time is of the essence.
~.~
no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 12:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 12:20 am (UTC)Time is of the essence, indeed!
no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 12:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 12:23 am (UTC)It's funny how fast one's mind works in a panic.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 12:30 am (UTC)Yes, I could see Jack's mind taking some crazy directions, particularly. *g*
So happy you liked it!
no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 12:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 12:50 am (UTC)Should be some needle-witted saying about nooses turning to lifelines
And I know if he had just a few seconds more, he'd have thought of one! *g*
I love this and am so glad you found such a perfect way to use the prompt. *mems*
no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 12:55 am (UTC)I'm so glad you liked this! Thank you for your thoughtful comments.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 12:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 01:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 01:39 am (UTC)Thank you so much for commenting -- I'm glad you liked this.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 02:47 am (UTC)Maybe you could do that with some other scenes, too?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 03:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 04:23 am (UTC)/nostalgic
no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 05:23 am (UTC)Not sure why the filmmakers thought that would be a good idea. Maybe they just wanted to go in an opposite direction from any of the fanfic out there.
Idiots.Not the brightest idea ever.Thank you for commenting here -- I'm so glad you liked the drabble.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 04:54 am (UTC)I rediscovered the drabble you wrote that just set me back on my heels. It was the one about Jack dueling with Norrington, knocking his pud in the mud and the kick on it was a reference to Norrington's "I half expected it to be wooden". Do you ever just read some something or the other and go--man that is totally (think old John Denver) FarOut!?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 05:26 am (UTC)And yes, they are friends at this point, and I truly wish that had never changed. Thank you for commenting so kindly here. I really appreciate it!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 07:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 07:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 08:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-11 11:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-11 11:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-11 05:11 am (UTC)The writers--after they apparently got swelled heads from the reception of the first movie, an opinion I developed based on their own comments in interviews in magazines like Script, newspaper interviews as well as some of Rossio's blog entries--stated outright they wanted to "explore how the audience would react to the characters not having coinciding agendas the next time around".
In other words, they only considered they were "friends" when their efforts dovetailed.
This in spite of the fact they had Will saving Jack from execution, Elizabeth joining them, even Norrington and Swann having an apparent change of heart,unnecessary to the plot if only the aim of getting Elizabeth saved and the evil pirates neutralized was the point.
You had a pair of writers so full of themselves with their initial success, they felt free to go haring off in a complete about face just to play "what if" and experiment as if consistency of character--as also played by the cast!--was irrelevant! They filled both sequels with pointless, time wasting elements for cheap jokes and novelty.
Even the duration of Will's exile is an example of them over-elaborating and writing anything-for-the moment. They said FIRST that it was only for ten years, that the confusion was caused by scenes edited out of the release print and THAT caused the confusion ie. not theirs but the director's "fault". A buck pass if ever there was one since they wrote ALL of the script, including dialogue that had it BOTH ways so it wouldn't matter if scenes were edited out. Later they reversed themselves to insist that Will's term as captain was "always" meant to be permanent.
It's a marvel these people think we don't READ this stuff where they contradict themselves in print???
As for "It had to be something dark and disastrous to explain Elizabeth going back to sea and amongst pirates."
Yes, in order to bring the young couple back into a new story, but there was no need to either have them become adversaries of Jack nor even to go overboard on the supernatural element.
Fanwriters' three years of plots aside, they had the ready made "hook" that they in fact did use to get things rolling: everyone getting into trouble with the crown for Jack's escape.
It's the direction they went with that premise, which became so overblown, inconsistently using the characters as established, putting in an overload of the supernatural instead of the piquant "garnish" the undead pirates made in the first film. Ghost stories and cursed treasure are natural ingredients to fit in the pirate genre, but a Greek Goddess trapped in human form?
Also, frankly a more sparingly seen Dutchman and her captain perhaps used as a glimpsed menace and harbinger of doom and a final rise from the sea to exact retribution from Beckett would have been more effective than to have her playing bird dog for the EIC in broad daylight for two movies.
Did I hate the sequels? Certainly not. Was I disappointed? Absolutely. Will I keep right on "playing pirates"? You bet! Even if I have to use bits and pieces from all the films to cobble my own "universe" closer in spirit to the FIRST film.
Oops, I didn't intend a soapbox but I'm so running off at the motuh/keyboard i'll have to post this in two parts! Sorry!
Motormouth Mouse Pt 2
Date: 2008-11-11 05:14 am (UTC)I personally don't think Jack and Lizzy, nor Jack and Will, for that matter are about to jump each other's bones nor that Norrington was so weak-willed and self-deluding he'd turn into a sot after running his ship into a hurricane nor blame everyone but himself afterward.
I wish they'd continued to have Anamaria there to pick up again with Jack, a nice foursome instead of a manufactured "triangle" that was used to tease no matter how out of character for both, then simply dropped with not so much as a scene for resolution in the third film!
All that said, I am perfectly happy to let a good writer convince me at least for the duration of a story on any of the above or other combination. The sequels frankly made such a shambles of continuity or consistency all elements are up for grabs. That CAN be an exciting opportunity in fan writing. Anyone who cares to bring back Anamaria as Jack's "lady" and let Will and Elizabeth remain the consistent steadfast lovers they are in the first film will have my undying gratitude.I am not at all unhappy with the "triangle" resolved into a OT3 done by certain very thoughtful and plausible writers and I don't even normally care for slash!
The sequels are a mess, pure and simple. Their chief value is in extra footage of characters we all fell in love with. I can live with that!
Re: Motormouth Mouse Pt 2
Date: 2008-11-11 05:54 pm (UTC)The difference being, of course, that Disney would NEVER drop a hint that the latter could happen. Therefore, as a J/W fan, I don't have to worry about being a canon nazi. ;-)
Re: Motormouth Mouse Pt 2
From:Re: Motormouth Mouse Pt 2
From:Re: Motormouth Mouse Pt 2
From:Re: Motormouth Mouse Pt 2
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-11 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-11 11:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 02:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 03:42 am (UTC)