dwgm: Kimi Birds (WTF?)
[personal profile] dwgm
The Mary Sue question is an interesting one. [livejournal.com profile] jenthegypsy, new to fanfic (what an adventure lies ahead!!), was asking me what a Mary Sue is, and, coincidentally, a member of [livejournal.com profile] little_details asked about the origin of the term. The term apparently dates back to a fanfic story in the Star Trek: The Original Series fandom, which actually had an OFC named Mary Sue. However, this site referenced in a comment in the [livejournal.com profile] little_details post has this to say...

She (or he) is created to serve one purpose: wish fulfilment. When a writer invents someone through whom he/she can have fantastic adventures and meet famous people (fictional or real), this character is a Mary Sue. (We don't have a name for the male version -- suggestions?

and that...

storytellers have been rehashing Mary Sue since the dawn of time....

By this definition, most any major canon character would be a Mary Sue, not just original characters. Think about it. Harry Potter? Frodo or Aragorn? And, most especially Jack Sparrow, and all the main characters of Pirates of the Caribbean.

Another referenced article in the [livejournal.com profile] little_details post has this to say about Mary Sue's characteristics...

She has better hair, better clothes, better weapons, better brains, better sex, and better karma than anyone else. Even next to the strong and interesting heroines of twentieth-century media and fiction, she stands out. She is singular; she is impossible to ignore.

Now replace "she" with "he", and you've got Jack Sparrow all over.

You could make a case that any main character in any story is a Mary Sue, unless he or she is a true antihero, with characteristics and adventures that serve as dire warnings rather than desirable examples. And who wants to read that, at least most of the time?

It doesn't seem to me that it's possible to write any character and fail to project one's experiences and philosophies through that character, canon or otherwise. And I don't think I am alone in wanting to read stories that are uplifting, and about people who are extraordinary, in one way or another. So it seems to me we're destined to be inundated with Mary Sues, as we have been since people started telling stories.
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

Date: 2005-02-11 04:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cymbeline.livejournal.com
Trying to keep an OFC realistic is a challenge...especially when she is paired with said Captain Jack Sparrow. A woman would have to be a Mary Sue to keep up with him!

Date: 2005-02-11 05:03 pm (UTC)
ext_15536: Fuschias by Geek Mama (Pirate!)
From: [identity profile] geekmama.livejournal.com
Yes, I can't see him being interested in anyone ordinary, not for very long. He needs someone fabulous, being so fabulous himself.

Date: 2005-02-11 05:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cymbeline.livejournal.com
It's what makes him so fun to write!

Date: 2005-02-11 05:14 pm (UTC)
ext_15536: Fuschias by Geek Mama (Pirate!)
From: [identity profile] geekmama.livejournal.com
Ain't it the truth?!!

Date: 2005-02-11 05:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] linaelyn.livejournal.com
You have a good point, and this post made me think, a lot. In some form, every powerful main character has some of the hallmarks of a Mary Sue, the sense that the reader holds strong identification with the main character.

Odysseus? Mary Sue for all who ever dreamed of adventures.

Juliet AND Romeo? Mary Sues for anyone who crushed on someone their parents disapproved of.

HOWEVER. The problem with Bad Fanfic Mary Sue is that she's unflawed. Captain Jack Sparrow is extraordinary, to be sure. But he's hardly what you'd call flawless. Projecting one's experiences isn't what makes a character a Mary Sue in the traditional sense. It's actually that the Mary Sue is so very perfect that the reader cannot honestly identify with the character, without resort to egomania or immaturity.

Ted & Terry and Johnny, created in Jack Sparrow someone we love to identify with. But we also see that we might fall into some of the same pitfalls that lead Jack into more pain to himself than strictly necessary. Such as a short drop and a sudden stop.

Date: 2005-02-11 05:54 pm (UTC)
ext_7904: (Default)
From: [identity profile] porridgebird.livejournal.com
Hmmmm..... my understanding has always been that a Mary Sue -- by definition -- is not a canon character. But (in fanfic) she becomes the Star of the Show. She's not always perfect or even "better" -- a lot of the time she's got big fat angsty problems that the canon characters are compelled to fix (usually with their genitalia). She's an author insert and the story is about her. The canon folk just co-star or play supporting roles

See what I think has happened is that, over the decades, the definition of MS has expanded so far beyond the original that there are some who say ANY OC is a Mary Sue. But I'm remembering back when it pretty much started, in the Trek fandom ("Yeoman Mary Sue"), after the first series ended & before the first movie was even in the works. That's where I first heard the term, and it was much more specific than it is now. It's way overused these days, imo.

Date: 2005-02-11 05:58 pm (UTC)
ext_7904: (Default)
From: [identity profile] porridgebird.livejournal.com
We don't have a name for the male version

Traditionally, "Gary Stu."

Date: 2005-02-11 05:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cacopheny.livejournal.com
I think people over-do the Mary Sue thing. Way over-do. Mary Sues are generally poorly written, unbelievable, transparent, and (often completely) without faults-- or with stupid faults. Characters like quirky Jack Sparrow aren't Mary Sues because they have plenty of faults, they're very well-rounded, and they have plausablility. Also, if you tackle a "super-char" Mary Sue (the better-everything), and you write it *well*, and give his/her personality a lot of depth, that negates the whole issue.

I wouldn't worry about it. v.v

Date: 2005-02-11 06:21 pm (UTC)
ext_7904: (Default)
From: [identity profile] porridgebird.livejournal.com
You see a lot of Mary-Sue-izing of canon in Harry Potter fics... where Hermione suddenly cuts loose, turns goth, straightens her hair (dyes it black with red tips, or some such), gets her naval pierced, grows giant boobs, dons black leather micro-mini and stiletto heels... and everyone of the male persuasion at Hogwarts falls flat on his face when she walks by. Including the professors. But this, of course, is not Hermione. It's sneaky Mary Sue in disguise.

Date: 2005-02-11 06:36 pm (UTC)
ext_15536: Fuschias by Geek Mama (WTF?)
From: [identity profile] geekmama.livejournal.com
The problem with Bad Fanfic Mary Sue is that she's unflawed.

Ah! But as [livejournal.com profile] athersgeo says here, a Mary Sue can also be Perfectly Tragic, Perfectly Flawed, or Perfectly Evil.

I agree with [livejournal.com profile] porridgebird's comment below... "over the decades, the definition of MS has expanded so far beyond the original that there are some who say ANY OC is a Mary Sue." I've noticed that strain of thought among the writers around here on LJ (probably because that's mostly where I read and comment) and it bothers me not only because a couple of my plotlines feature OC's, but, more importantly, because that attitude puts a constraint on every writer, causing them to hesitate to post stories that include OC's, or even create OC's at all, especially if the character plays a major role in a story. And when you have writers of the high caliber of many I read around here, it's a sad thing.

Date: 2005-02-11 06:56 pm (UTC)
ext_15536: Fuschias by Geek Mama (WTF?)
From: [identity profile] geekmama.livejournal.com
Jack Sparrow or Will Turner are both much more likely candidates for authorial inserts

Precisely. So a character that is the author's "wish fulfillment" or "projection" isn't necessarily a Mary Sue. As [livejournal.com profile] porridgebird said, the definition has expanded way beyond the original, and I think the current iteration causes good authors to hesitate to write OC's, which is a shame.

Date: 2005-02-11 07:00 pm (UTC)
ext_7904: (Default)
From: [identity profile] porridgebird.livejournal.com
Ahhh, but it's no Mary Sue (or Gary Stu) if an author creates a self-insert to star in an original piece of work. It's when they try to cram their OC into someone else's work, to overshadow existing canon (damaging or totally destroying existing canon in the process). That's the thing.

So, no I don't agree with dismissing canon-folk as MS. That's one of the places I think the term is totally misused.

Date: 2005-02-11 07:06 pm (UTC)
ext_15536: Fuschias by Geek Mama (WTF?)
From: [identity profile] geekmama.livejournal.com
As I said in a couple of other replies, the reason I think the expansion of the definition is a Very Bad Thing is because it makes good authors hesitate to create OC's, especially if they'll play a big role in a fic. I have a new online friend, too, who has a really wonderful story posted on ff.net, but because it has an OFC, she could be hesitant about posting it here, and she shouldn't be! The OFC is interesting in her own right, and has a major role, but doesn't take over and reduce the canon characters to supporting roles. It's more like a crossover, her story with theirs.

Date: 2005-02-11 07:10 pm (UTC)
ext_15536: Fuschias by Geek Mama (WTF?)
From: [identity profile] geekmama.livejournal.com
I don't agree with dismissing canon-folk as MS. That's one of the places I think the term is totally misused.

And yet I've seen comments by some of the best authors indicating they've made a Mary Sue of a canon character. If they are in character, how can they be Mary Sues?

Date: 2005-02-11 07:24 pm (UTC)
ext_7904: (Default)
From: [identity profile] porridgebird.livejournal.com
A canon character, who is IN character? I don't get it how this could be a MS. Do you have an example? (now I'm curious)

Date: 2005-02-11 07:32 pm (UTC)
ext_15536: Fuschias by Geek Mama (WTF?)
From: [identity profile] geekmama.livejournal.com
Can't remember which one said it, or which story at [livejournal.com profile] impofperversity (they are so very prolific, as you know) but it was either [livejournal.com profile] tessabeth or [livejournal.com profile] viva_gloria, who are, as you know, two of the best authors in the fandom, with 100% spot-on characterizations at all times, at least IMO. That one really caused me to say, "Huh??", but I've run across others, too, though I can't remember who or where at this point.

Date: 2005-02-11 07:46 pm (UTC)
ext_7904: (Default)
From: [identity profile] porridgebird.livejournal.com
Hmmm! I'll have to look for that. But... it suddenly occurs to me... in combining two canons, as they often do (so very brilliantly) would a character from one canon be an OC (kinda sorta) in the other? And a possible MS in THAT respect? Now this is getting too twisted and making my brain hurt. I think it's more likely that the "expanded" definition strikes again.

But yeah, I'll look for it; it's hard to say without seeing what they're talking about.

Date: 2005-02-11 07:57 pm (UTC)
ext_15536: Fuschias by Geek Mama (WTF?)
From: [identity profile] geekmama.livejournal.com
I'm not sure how in-character Shaftoe is in their stuff, as I still haven't read the book, but I'd bet it's fairly spot on, as I've not read anything OOC by them, ever. I don't think you can call either Sparrow or Shaftoe an OC. Crossover fics are a specialized catagory, in this case, and if it's done well, all canon characters in both universes will be in character, and outside Mary Sue criteria.

It's making my brain hurt too. It's such a subjective and convoluted subject.

Date: 2005-02-11 08:01 pm (UTC)
ext_15536: Fuschias by Geek Mama (WTF?)
From: [identity profile] geekmama.livejournal.com
Thanks for that link. Really a great discussion on the subject!

Yes, I find the idea of Elizabeth being a Mary Sue outrageous, and yet I've heard it said several times in the last year.

Date: 2005-02-11 08:13 pm (UTC)
ext_7904: (Default)
From: [identity profile] porridgebird.livejournal.com
BUT please don't hit me if Shaftoe wasn't from another canon... if they'd made him up entirely... would he be a Mary Sue?

OW! brain just broke... think I blew a head gasket


Date: 2005-02-11 08:20 pm (UTC)
ext_15536: Fuschias by Geek Mama (WTF?)
From: [identity profile] geekmama.livejournal.com
Well, he's pretty perfect, but no more so than Sparrow. They're counterparts that way. So I'd say no.

Date: 2005-02-12 04:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] athersgeo.livejournal.com
*blinks*

*does a double take*

*reads own post*

Oooh. I remember... *looks sheepish*

Very thought provoking post here, though - and all the replies :)

Date: 2005-02-12 04:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] radiumx.livejournal.com
I always liked "Rock Hardstrong" myself. ;-D

Date: 2005-02-12 05:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] radiumx.livejournal.com
Ahhh, but it's no Mary Sue (or Gary Stu) if an author creates a self-insert to star in an original piece of work.

I've always believed the same - A Mary/Gary is only such if they're trying to make it un-obvious but fail miserably.

A group of friends who did not go to the same high school as I used to write a serial web piece called "Self-Extraction". This chronicled the adventures of a squad of assassins hired by literary aficionados to 'extract' particularly persistent or annoying 'self-inserted' Mary/Garys from their favorite TV shows, comics, and books.

Date: 2005-02-12 05:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] radiumx.livejournal.com
I think he's a Mary Sue regardless of his origin. Especially if he's acting OOC (which he isn't?)
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

Profile

dwgm: Kimi Birds (Default)
dwgm

September 2016

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 27th, 2026 09:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios