Captain Jack "Mary Sue" Sparrow?
Feb. 11th, 2005 03:58 pmThe Mary Sue question is an interesting one.
jenthegypsy, new to fanfic (what an adventure lies ahead!!), was asking me what a Mary Sue is, and, coincidentally, a member of
little_details asked about the origin of the term. The term apparently dates back to a fanfic story in the Star Trek: The Original Series fandom, which actually had an OFC named Mary Sue. However, this site referenced in a comment in the
little_details post has this to say...
and that...
By this definition, most any major canon character would be a Mary Sue, not just original characters. Think about it. Harry Potter? Frodo or Aragorn? And, most especially Jack Sparrow, and all the main characters of Pirates of the Caribbean.
Another referenced article in the
little_details post has this to say about Mary Sue's characteristics...
Now replace "she" with "he", and you've got Jack Sparrow all over.
You could make a case that any main character in any story is a Mary Sue, unless he or she is a true antihero, with characteristics and adventures that serve as dire warnings rather than desirable examples. And who wants to read that, at least most of the time?
It doesn't seem to me that it's possible to write any character and fail to project one's experiences and philosophies through that character, canon or otherwise. And I don't think I am alone in wanting to read stories that are uplifting, and about people who are extraordinary, in one way or another. So it seems to me we're destined to be inundated with Mary Sues, as we have been since people started telling stories.
She (or he) is created to serve one purpose: wish fulfilment. When a writer invents someone through whom he/she can have fantastic adventures and meet famous people (fictional or real), this character is a Mary Sue. (We don't have a name for the male version -- suggestions?
and that...
storytellers have been rehashing Mary Sue since the dawn of time....
By this definition, most any major canon character would be a Mary Sue, not just original characters. Think about it. Harry Potter? Frodo or Aragorn? And, most especially Jack Sparrow, and all the main characters of Pirates of the Caribbean.
Another referenced article in the
She has better hair, better clothes, better weapons, better brains, better sex, and better karma than anyone else. Even next to the strong and interesting heroines of twentieth-century media and fiction, she stands out. She is singular; she is impossible to ignore.
Now replace "she" with "he", and you've got Jack Sparrow all over.
You could make a case that any main character in any story is a Mary Sue, unless he or she is a true antihero, with characteristics and adventures that serve as dire warnings rather than desirable examples. And who wants to read that, at least most of the time?
It doesn't seem to me that it's possible to write any character and fail to project one's experiences and philosophies through that character, canon or otherwise. And I don't think I am alone in wanting to read stories that are uplifting, and about people who are extraordinary, in one way or another. So it seems to me we're destined to be inundated with Mary Sues, as we have been since people started telling stories.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 05:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 05:33 pm (UTC)Odysseus? Mary Sue for all who ever dreamed of adventures.
Juliet AND Romeo? Mary Sues for anyone who crushed on someone their parents disapproved of.
HOWEVER. The problem with Bad Fanfic Mary Sue is that she's unflawed. Captain Jack Sparrow is extraordinary, to be sure. But he's hardly what you'd call flawless. Projecting one's experiences isn't what makes a character a Mary Sue in the traditional sense. It's actually that the Mary Sue is so very perfect that the reader cannot honestly identify with the character, without resort to egomania or immaturity.
Ted & Terry and Johnny, created in Jack Sparrow someone we love to identify with. But we also see that we might fall into some of the same pitfalls that lead Jack into more pain to himself than strictly necessary. Such as a short drop and a sudden stop.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 05:54 pm (UTC)See what I think has happened is that, over the decades, the definition of MS has expanded so far beyond the original that there are some who say ANY OC is a Mary Sue. But I'm remembering back when it pretty much started, in the Trek fandom ("Yeoman Mary Sue"), after the first series ended & before the first movie was even in the works. That's where I first heard the term, and it was much more specific than it is now. It's way overused these days, imo.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 05:58 pm (UTC)Traditionally, "Gary Stu."
no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 05:59 pm (UTC)I wouldn't worry about it. v.v
no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 06:36 pm (UTC)Ah! But as
I agree with
no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 06:56 pm (UTC)Precisely. So a character that is the author's "wish fulfillment" or "projection" isn't necessarily a Mary Sue. As
no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 07:00 pm (UTC)So, no I don't agree with dismissing canon-folk as MS. That's one of the places I think the term is totally misused.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 07:10 pm (UTC)And yet I've seen comments by some of the best authors indicating they've made a Mary Sue of a canon character. If they are in character, how can they be Mary Sues?
no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 07:46 pm (UTC)But yeah, I'll look for it; it's hard to say without seeing what they're talking about.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 07:57 pm (UTC)It's making my brain hurt too. It's such a subjective and convoluted subject.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 08:01 pm (UTC)Yes, I find the idea of Elizabeth being a Mary Sue outrageous, and yet I've heard it said several times in the last year.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 08:13 pm (UTC)OW! brain just broke... think I blew a head gasket
no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 04:38 am (UTC)*does a double take*
*reads own post*
Oooh. I remember... *looks sheepish*
Very thought provoking post here, though - and all the replies :)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 04:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 05:00 am (UTC)I've always believed the same - A Mary/Gary is only such if they're trying to make it un-obvious but fail miserably.
A group of friends who did not go to the same high school as I used to write a serial web piece called "Self-Extraction". This chronicled the adventures of a squad of assassins hired by literary aficionados to 'extract' particularly persistent or annoying 'self-inserted' Mary/Garys from their favorite TV shows, comics, and books.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 05:02 am (UTC)